What Are They Hiding?

When the mainstream media start to question the Obama administration, you know it's bad.  Almost immediately after the attacks on the American embassies in Libya and Egypt and the murder of the American ambassador to Libya, I had a number of questions that I think many people had that we wanted to have answered by the Obama administration and the State Department.  Occurring as the attacks did on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, intuitively many suspected that terrorists were behind these attacks.  There was the possibility - remote to me - that it was not terrorist related, but on 9/11, what were the chances of that?

The Obama administration for days afterward maintained that the attacks were not coordinated or planned by terrorists, even after the public started getting information making that connection.  Why would the administration do this?  What were they trying to accomplish?  The best guess I can come up with so far is that it was apparent early on that the administration was woefully unprepared and inadequate in its security arrangements, that there were serious questions about the administration being inept in not anticipating and being prepared for these attacks.  Which puts a share of the blame for the death of Ambassador Stevens on the administration.  Which looks very bad when Obama is up for reelection.

It's understandable that Obama would want people not to start asking questions and looking deeper, but in knowingly misrepresenting the nature and background of these attacks, he and his administration have shown a willingness to misrepresent to protect the President's reputation.  We've seen that willingness before, and it's a sign to me of the corruption that comes with power.  It's a sign of Obama's narcissism.  It's a sign that we can't truly trust Barack Obama.

Go to this link for CNN's report.
And this piece in the Wall Street Journal.

And discussion from Fox News about it: